By Jordan Robertson February 07, 2011
Intel Corp. has resumed shipments of a chip with a known flaw. But in order to get it, computer makers must promise not to use it in designs that trigger the serious performance problem.
Intel stopped production of the faulty "chipset" last month, after discovering that it would cause some computers to gradually lose their ability to talk to their hard disk and DVD drives. Cleanup was expected to cost $1 billion. The admission was both an embarrassment for the world's biggest computer chip maker, as well as a sign that Intel learned its lesson from its famously botched handling of another chip flaw issue nearly 20 years ago. Intel said Monday that its customers demanded that the latest faulty chip go back on sale while Intel hustles out a fixed version, which is expected to ship this month. Computers can be designed in a way that avoids the problem. Two big computer makers, Hewlett-Packard Co. and Dell Inc., have said some of their machines have the faulty chip. They have offered refunds. Intel said the latest decision wouldn't change the company's financial guidance. The about-face is noteworthy because in the mid-1990s Intel was pilloried for its insistence on selling a chip the company knew was flawed. At the time, Intel played down the severity of the problem, which consisted of a calculating error in the Pentium processor. But Intel eventually caved to public pressure and replaced the chips at a heavy cost. The incident became one of Silicon Valley's most famous blunders.
Read more here –>canadianbusiness.com


Twitter
Google
Why would people buy a flawed Sandy Bridge Chip from Intel? Thats cause there are a lot of fanatics and mentally flawed individuals walking on the face of this planet. The claim that there is a demand for a flawed chips is of course a marketing ploy I doubt very much the demand exists. It's called damage control at it's best give people a false idea and hope they buy into it. Classic disinformation at it's best. If a chip is flawed it's flawed period. But of course Intel is trying to save face after spending 1 billion dollars to fix this mess. Whats interesting about the author of this article is he refers to another Intel flaw that is 20 years old and forgets there has been many more flaws in between a classic move to minimize Intels flawed Chip history. Sorry folks the truth is Intel have a long history of failed products this isn't the first time down that road. It's just the fanboy don't want you to know it. Do the research and find out for yourself.
Comment by JTECH — February 7, 2011 @ 10:26 pm